# hosting vs SyncWatch同步观影

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | SyncWatch同步观影 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 46/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #24 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 140 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.4.4 · 6 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

SyncWatch同步观影 scores 46/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

SyncWatch同步观影 ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, SyncWatch同步观影 is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [SyncWatch同步观影](https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/syncwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-syncwatch