# hosting vs supabase-automated-self-host

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | supabase-automated-self-host |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 48/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 506 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

supabase-automated-self-host scores 48/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, supabase-automated-self-host is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [supabase-automated-self-host](https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supabase-automated-self-host.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-supabase-automated-self-host