# hosting vs Speedarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | Speedarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 ✓ | 0/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #34 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 24 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2026.09.21 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

hosting scores 27/100 against 0/100 for Speedarr, so it is the safer default.

Speedarr ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, Speedarr is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [Speedarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-speedarr