# hosting vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 11 125 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +103 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

SonarQube scores 71/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

SonarQube ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

SonarQube is growing faster right now (+103 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-sonarqube