# hosting vs socktop

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | socktop |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 48/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #28 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 193 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.60.2 · 24 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

socktop scores 48/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

socktop ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, socktop is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

socktop is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [socktop](https://selfhost.directory/project/socktop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/socktop.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-socktop