hostingvsSketchForge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | SketchForge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #9 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 1 177 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v1.0.3 · 17 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
SketchForge scores 55/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
SketchForge ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, SketchForge is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
SketchForge is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →SketchForge details →