# hosting vs signserver-ce

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | signserver-ce |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 51/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 2 in PKI |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 440 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +4 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.7.1 · 26 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | LGPL-2.1 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

signserver-ce scores 51/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

signserver-ce ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

signserver-ce is growing faster right now (+4 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [signserver-ce](https://selfhost.directory/project/signserver-ce) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/signserver-ce.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-signserver-ce