# hosting vs Semaphore UI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | Semaphore UI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 73/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 14 337 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +149 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Semaphore UI scores 73/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

Semaphore UI is growing faster right now (+149 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [Semaphore UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/semaphore-ui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-semaphore-ui