# hosting vs scm-manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | scm-manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 53/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #10 of 14 in Code Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 184 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 3.11.4 · 11 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

scm-manager scores 53/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

scm-manager ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, scm-manager is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [scm-manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/scm-manager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scm-manager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-scm-manager