# hosting vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 5 915 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +116 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 41 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.19.4 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

scanopy scores 64/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, scanopy is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

scanopy is growing faster right now (+116 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-scanopy