# hosting vs ruTorrent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | ruTorrent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 62/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #4 of 12 in Bittorrent |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 2 188 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +9 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v5.3.19 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

ruTorrent scores 62/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

ruTorrent ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

ruTorrent is growing faster right now (+9 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [ruTorrent](https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rutorrent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-rutorrent