# hosting vs RSS Guard

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | RSS Guard |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #6 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 2 817 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +56 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 5.2.5 · 20 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

RSS Guard scores 64/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

RSS Guard ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, RSS Guard is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

RSS Guard is growing faster right now (+56 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [RSS Guard](https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-guard) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-guard.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-rss-guard