# hosting vs Redirecterr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | Redirecterr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 42/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #115 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 144 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Redirecterr scores 42/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Redirecterr is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [Redirecterr](https://selfhost.directory/project/redirecterr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/redirecterr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-redirecterr