# hosting vs recyclarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | recyclarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 64/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #15 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 2 145 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +26 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v8.8.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

recyclarr scores 64/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

recyclarr ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, recyclarr is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

recyclarr is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [recyclarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/recyclarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-recyclarr