hostingvsrecyclarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | recyclarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #15 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 2 145 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 |
| Latest release | — | v8.8.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | C# |
Which one should you pick?
recyclarr scores 64/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
recyclarr ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, recyclarr is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
recyclarr is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →recyclarr details →