# hosting vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 57/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 383 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

QGIS Web Client scores 57/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-qwc2