# hosting vs Pulumi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | Pulumi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 25 829 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +30 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Pulumi scores 78/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

Pulumi ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulumi is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

Pulumi is growing faster right now (+30 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [Pulumi](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulumi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-pulumi