# hosting vs Prysm

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | Prysm |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 65/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 3 790 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +6 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Prysm scores 65/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

Prysm ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

Prysm is growing faster right now (+6 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [Prysm](https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prysm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-prysm