# hosting vs Prowlarr

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | Prowlarr |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 2 in Indexer |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 7 463 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +203 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 24 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v2.7.0.5723 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

Prowlarr scores 74/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

Prowlarr ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, Prowlarr is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

Prowlarr is growing faster right now (+203 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [Prowlarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/prowlarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/prowlarr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-prowlarr