# hosting vs Project OSRM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | Project OSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 8 178 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +75 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 16 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

Project OSRM scores 69/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

Project OSRM is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-project-osrm