# hosting vs pr-agent

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | pr-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 77/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 13 690 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +547 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 23 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.49.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

pr-agent scores 77/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

pr-agent ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, pr-agent is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

pr-agent is growing faster right now (+547 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [pr-agent](https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pr-agent.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-pr-agent