# hosting vs portchecker.io

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | portchecker.io |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 47/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #16 of 20 in Network Utilities |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 198 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 4 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.2.0 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

portchecker.io scores 47/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

portchecker.io ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, portchecker.io is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [portchecker.io](https://selfhost.directory/project/portcheckerio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/portcheckerio.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-portcheckerio