# hosting vs polar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | polar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 71/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 10 436 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +157 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

polar scores 71/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

polar ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

polar is growing faster right now (+157 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-polar