# hosting vs Pi Pocket

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hosting | Pi Pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 50/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #40 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 712 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.26.0 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi Pocket scores 50/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.

Pi Pocket ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.

If you want the quickest setup, Pi Pocket is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hosting](https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hosting.md)
- [Pi Pocket](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-pocket) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-pocket.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hosting-vs-pi-pocket