# horilla vs Windows ARM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | horilla | Windows ARM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 | 61/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Human Resource Management (HRM) | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 1 478 | 2 260 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.2.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | LGPL-2.1 | MIT |
| Main language | HTML | Batchfile |

## Which one should you pick?

Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 60/100 for horilla, so it is the safer default.

horilla ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.

If you want the quickest setup, horilla is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.

horilla is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [horilla](https://selfhost.directory/project/horilla) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/horilla.md)
- [Windows ARM](https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/windows-arm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/horilla-vs-windows-arm