Hoppscotch Community EditionvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hoppscotch Community Edition | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in API | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 80 712 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +209 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.9.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Hoppscotch Community Edition scores 83/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Hoppscotch Community Edition ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Hoppscotch Community Edition is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Hoppscotch Community Edition is growing faster right now (+209 stars in 30 days).
Hoppscotch Community Edition details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep Hoppscotch Community Edition, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with