# Hoppscotch Community Edition vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted [API projects](https://selfhost.directory/api), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Hoppscotch Community Edition | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in API | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 80 708 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +221 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.9.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Hoppscotch Community Edition scores 83/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

Hoppscotch Community Edition ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

Hoppscotch Community Edition is growing faster right now (+221 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Hoppscotch Community Edition](https://selfhost.directory/project/hoppscotch-community-edition) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hoppscotch-community-edition.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Hoppscotch vs Hoppscotch Community Edition](https://selfhost.directory/compare/hoppscotch-vs-hoppscotch-community-edition)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hoppscotch-community-edition-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api