# Hoppscotch Community Edition vs Umami

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Hoppscotch Community Edition | Umami |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 85/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in API | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 80 712 ✓ | 39 757 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +209 | +761 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | 2026.9.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Umami scores 85/100 against 83/100 for Hoppscotch Community Edition, so it is the safer default.

Hoppscotch Community Edition ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Umami.

If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Hoppscotch Community Edition needs more configuration.

Umami is growing faster right now (+761 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Hoppscotch Community Edition](https://selfhost.directory/project/hoppscotch-community-edition) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hoppscotch-community-edition.md)
- [Umami](https://selfhost.directory/project/umami) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/umami.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Hoppscotch vs Hoppscotch Community Edition](https://selfhost.directory/compare/hoppscotch-vs-hoppscotch-community-edition)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hoppscotch-community-edition-vs-umami