# Hoppscotch Community Edition vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Hoppscotch Community Edition | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in API | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 80 705 | 117 816 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +218 | +5 457 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | 2026.9.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 83/100 for Hoppscotch Community Edition, so it is the safer default.

Hoppscotch Community Edition ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Hoppscotch Community Edition](https://selfhost.directory/project/hoppscotch-community-edition) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hoppscotch-community-edition.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Hoppscotch vs Hoppscotch Community Edition](https://selfhost.directory/compare/hoppscotch-vs-hoppscotch-community-edition)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hoppscotch-community-edition-vs-tradingagents