Hoppscotch Community Editionvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hoppscotch Community Edition | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 13 in API | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 80 705 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +218 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.9.0 · 30 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Hoppscotch Community Edition scores 83/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
Hoppscotch Community Edition ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
Hoppscotch Community Edition is growing faster right now (+218 stars in 30 days).
Hoppscotch Community Edition details →supabase-automated-self-host details →
Swap a project
Keep Hoppscotch Community Edition, compare it with
Keep supabase-automated-self-host, compare it with