# Homebox vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Homebox | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Inventory Management | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 7 665 ✓ | 6 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +296 ✓ | +99 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.27.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Homebox scores 74/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

Homebox ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Homebox is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Homebox is growing faster right now (+296 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Homebox](https://selfhost.directory/project/homebox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/homebox.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/homebox-vs-zammad