# home-screens vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | home-screens | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 95 | 35 795 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +26 | +834 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v1.14.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 50/100 for home-screens, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for home-screens.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+834 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [home-screens](https://selfhost.directory/project/home-screens) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/home-screens.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/home-screens-vs-seaweedfs