home-screensvsilla-builder
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| home-screens | illa-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 94 | 12 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.14.0 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
illa-builder scores 67/100 against 50/100 for home-screens, so it is the safer default.
home-screens ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, home-screens is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
home-screens is growing faster right now (+25 stars in 30 days).
home-screens details →illa-builder details →
Swap a project
Keep home-screens, compare it with
Keep illa-builder, compare it with