Home AssistantvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Home Assistant | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 91/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 104 in Home Automation | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 91 805 | 8 552 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +668 | +83 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 61 | 6 |
| Latest release | 2026.11.0b0 · 28 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Home Assistant scores 91/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
Home Assistant ships more often: 61 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Home Assistant is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Home Assistant is growing faster right now (+668 stars in 30 days).
Home Assistant details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Home Assistant, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with