# Homarr vs Nightingale

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Homarr | Nightingale |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 ✓ | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 44 in Dashboard | #15 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 232 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +453 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 43 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.9.1 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Homarr scores 74/100 against 58/100 for Nightingale, so it is the safer default.

Homarr ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Nightingale.

If you want the quickest setup, Homarr is easier to run; Nightingale needs more configuration.

Homarr is growing faster right now (+453 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Homarr](https://selfhost.directory/project/homarr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/homarr.md)
- [Nightingale](https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/nightingale.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/homarr-vs-nightingale