# hoardy-web vs LinkWarden

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hoardy-web | LinkWarden |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 39/100 | 79/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #12 of 12 in Archiving & Preservation | #2 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 143 | 20 259 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +426 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 12 |
| Latest release | tool-v0.25.0 · 14 Sept 2026 ✓ | v2.16.3 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

LinkWarden scores 79/100 against 39/100 for hoardy-web, so it is the safer default.

LinkWarden is growing faster right now (+426 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hoardy-web](https://selfhost.directory/project/hoardy-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hoardy-web.md)
- [LinkWarden](https://selfhost.directory/project/linkwarden) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/linkwarden.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Karakeep vs LinkWarden](https://selfhost.directory/compare/karakeep-vs-linkwarden)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hoardy-web-vs-linkwarden