# hls-restream-proxy vs temporal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hls-restream-proxy | temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 83/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #42 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 255 | 24 045 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +785 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

temporal scores 83/100 against 46/100 for hls-restream-proxy, so it is the safer default.

temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hls-restream-proxy.

If you want the quickest setup, hls-restream-proxy is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.

temporal is growing faster right now (+785 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hls-restream-proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/hls-restream-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hls-restream-proxy.md)
- [temporal](https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/temporal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hls-restream-proxy-vs-temporal