# hls-restream-proxy vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hls-restream-proxy | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #42 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 255 | 35 793 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +868 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 46/100 for hls-restream-proxy, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hls-restream-proxy.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hls-restream-proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/hls-restream-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hls-restream-proxy.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hls-restream-proxy-vs-seaweedfs