# hls-restream-proxy vs Pi-hole

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hls-restream-proxy | Pi-hole |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 46/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #42 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 255 | 61 536 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +492 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 6 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 46/100 for hls-restream-proxy, so it is the safer default.

Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hls-restream-proxy.

Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+492 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hls-restream-proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/hls-restream-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hls-restream-proxy.md)
- [Pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pi-hole.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hls-restream-proxy-vs-pi-hole