# Hindsight vs Zammad

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Hindsight | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 55 628 ✓ | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 581 ✓ | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.1.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

Hindsight scores 86/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.

Hindsight ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.

If you want the quickest setup, Hindsight is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.

Hindsight is growing faster right now (+3 581 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Hindsight](https://selfhost.directory/project/hindsight) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hindsight.md)
- [Zammad](https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zammad.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hindsight-vs-zammad