# Hindsight vs Tile38

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Hindsight | Tile38 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 8 in Geospatial |
| GitHub stars | 55 728 ✓ | 9 749 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 681 ✓ | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.1.0 · 21 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.38.0 · 9 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Hindsight scores 86/100 against 66/100 for Tile38, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Tile38 is easier to run; Hindsight needs more configuration.

Hindsight is growing faster right now (+3 681 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Hindsight](https://selfhost.directory/project/hindsight) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hindsight.md)
- [Tile38](https://selfhost.directory/project/tile38) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tile38.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hindsight-vs-tile38