HindsightvsJupyterLab
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hindsight | JupyterLab | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 85/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 3 in Data Science |
| GitHub stars | 55 489 | 15 379 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 442 | +63 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 12 |
| Latest release | v1.1.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | v4.7.0b0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Hindsight scores 85/100 against 78/100 for JupyterLab, so it is the safer default.
JupyterLab ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Hindsight.
If you want the quickest setup, JupyterLab is easier to run; Hindsight needs more configuration.
Hindsight is growing faster right now (+3 442 stars in 30 days).
Hindsight details →JupyterLab details →