# HiClaw vs Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 ✓ | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

HiClaw scores 67/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.

If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+222 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-zero-to-jupyterhub-k8s