# HiClaw vs Zero-K

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | Zero-K |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #31 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 889 ✓ | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +220 ✓ | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Lua |

## Which one should you pick?

HiClaw scores 67/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+220 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [Zero-K](https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zero-k.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-zero-k