# HiClaw vs ytdlp_web_player

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | ytdlp_web_player |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 5 894 ✓ | 810 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +225 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

HiClaw scores 67/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+225 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [ytdlp_web_player](https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-ytdlpwebplayer