# HiClaw vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 8 650 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 ✓ | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

HiClaw scores 67/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-workout-cool