# HiClaw vs WBO

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | WBO |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 9 in Whiteboarding |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 ✓ | 2 675 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 ✓ | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 4 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v2.18.26 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

HiClaw scores 67/100 against 61/100 for WBO, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for WBO.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+223 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [WBO](https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wbo.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-wbo