# HiClaw vs Upptime

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | Upptime |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 17 183 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Markdown |

## Which one should you pick?

Upptime scores 69/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.

HiClaw is growing faster right now (+222 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [Upptime](https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/upptime.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-upptime