# HiClaw vs Typebot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | Typebot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 70/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 6 in Chatbot |
| GitHub stars | 5 886 | 10 585 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +223 | +224 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 | v3.19.1 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Typebot scores 70/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for Typebot.

If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; Typebot needs more configuration.

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [Typebot](https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typebot.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-typebot