# HiClaw vs Stash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | HiClaw | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #32 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 885 | 13 308 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +222 | +302 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 15 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 ✓ | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Stash scores 78/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

HiClaw ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.

## Details

- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)
- [Stash](https://selfhost.directory/project/stash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hiclaw-vs-stash